Leadership turmoil at Idaho community college leads to negative outlook
North Idaho College had its outlook revised to negative by Moody's (MCO) after management turmoil, including the firing of its president, put the accreditation of the two-year college at risk.
If the two-year college loses accreditation, credits students received for completed classes would not be eligible to transfer to a university. Loss of accreditation could put federal funding at risk and cause enrollment to decline.
Moody’s warned in a December report the turmoil or loss of accreditation could affect enrollment.
The community college, located in Coeur d’Alene, is a feeder school for the University of Idaho in
Moody’s revised the outlook to negative from stable and affirmed the college’s A1 issuer and A2 revenue bond ratings.
The college had
The revised outlook “primarily reflects governance credibility and board structure risks,” Moody’s analysts wrote. “These risks are highlighted by board dysfunction, with a small group of publicly elected board members and significant turnover at key senior leadership positions.”
The president’s dismissal came at the hands of Board Chair
Three vice presidents resigned after the president was fired.
The “disputes between board members and with college leaders have been public, including the dismissal of the college’s former president and complaints against actions of the board,” Moody’s analysts wrote.
The Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities, in charge of the school’s accreditation, is planning a visit to assess these governance concerns.
Affirmation of the college’s A1 issuer rating reflects “the college’s important regional role as a provider of two-year education in northern
Those financial strengths, in addition to institutional aid from the federal government provide the college with some stability as it seeks to maintain enrollment amid ongoing governance issues, Moody’s analysts wrote.
Idaho State Board of Education President
“In short, action or inaction by the College’s Board of Trustees that places accreditation at risk would result in long-term injury to the very students you were elected to serve,” Liebich wrote. “It would also significantly impair the College’s ability to recruit and retain students, faculty and staff. Indeed, the very viability of the College itself could hang in the balance. We respectfully request that you set aside parochial or partisan interests, and urgently focus on the best interests of students and the College before both are irreparably harmed.”