|
|
By (Reuters) - The complaint filed in Suffolk Superior Court claims Uber and Lyft violate state minimum wage, hour and sick time laws. "Uber and Lyft have built their billion-dollar businesses while denying their drivers basic employee protections and benefits for years,” Uber and Lyft argue that the vast majority of their drivers enjoy the flexibility that comes with on-demand work, and a recent analysis by Cornell University of "This (coronavirus) crisis has really shown that we need to do everything possible to support these workers, especially those providing an essential service," Healey said at a news conference when asked why her office waited until now to file the lawsuit. Uber in a statement said it would contest the action in court and said it stood ready with Lyft in a statement said the lawsuit threatens to eliminate work for more than 50,000 people in (Reporting by
Copyright © Reuters 2008.
All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content,
including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without
the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are
registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies
around the world.
Search NewsFilter ResultsPublication DateTopicProvider |
News, commentary and research reports are from third-party sources unaffiliated with Fidelity. Fidelity does not endorse or adopt their content. Fidelity makes no guarantees that information supplied is accurate, complete, or timely, and does not provide any warranties regarding results obtained from their use.